<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Prosecuting Eco-Marks Part IV:  Green Patent Blog Requests Reconsideration, Argues Acquired Distinctiveness</title>
	<link>http://greenpatentblog.com/2008/09/21/prosecuting-eco-marks-part-iv-green-patent-blog-requests-reconsideration-argues-acquired-distinctiveness/</link>
	<description>covering intellectual property issues in clean technology</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: SU9S</title>
		<link>http://greenpatentblog.com/2008/09/21/prosecuting-eco-marks-part-iv-green-patent-blog-requests-reconsideration-argues-acquired-distinctiveness/#comment-1827</link>
		<author>SU9S</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 12:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://greenpatentblog.com/2008/09/21/prosecuting-eco-marks-part-iv-green-patent-blog-requests-reconsideration-argues-acquired-distinctiveness/#comment-1827</guid>
		<description>Good luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
