<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Potter Drilling&#8217;s Geothermal Spallation Innovation</title>
	<link>http://greenpatentblog.com/2009/07/15/potter-drillings-geothermal-spallation-innovation/</link>
	<description>covering intellectual property issues in clean technology</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 20:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: J. Todd Newton</title>
		<link>http://greenpatentblog.com/2009/07/15/potter-drillings-geothermal-spallation-innovation/#comment-18262</link>
		<author>J. Todd Newton</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 18:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://greenpatentblog.com/2009/07/15/potter-drillings-geothermal-spallation-innovation/#comment-18262</guid>
		<description>Interesting. Has this particular technology seen field use? 

I'd be interested in the effectiveness of this approach compared to traditional contact drilling methods in similar subterranean conditions.

It would seem that lighter strings would be permitted as the torque loads/weight are/could be substantially reduced. 

JTN</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. Has this particular technology seen field use? </p>
<p>I&#8217;d be interested in the effectiveness of this approach compared to traditional contact drilling methods in similar subterranean conditions.</p>
<p>It would seem that lighter strings would be permitted as the torque loads/weight are/could be substantially reduced. </p>
<p>JTN</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
